(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
Jan Harkes schrieb: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 01:17:54AM +0100, Kurt Huwig wrote: > > Hello! > > > > The patch from 5.3.2 to 5.3.3 does not work. The right way to make > > patches is: > > > > diff -ruN dir1 dir2 > > > > if you use CVS remember to use the '-u' switch!!! > > > > I made a working patch, but don't want to send it to the mailinglist. > > Please eMail me if you want it. > > > > Kurt > > Thanks, > > I guess my .cvsrc wasn't hoarded on my laptop when I made that previous > diff. Redid the patch using, > > cvs rdiff -u -rc5_3_2 -rc5_3_3 coda > diff-5.3.2-5.3.3 > > and put it up on ftp. Shouldn't a non unidiff patch work just as > well, except for the horrible readability? I myself prefer unidiff > format because it is easier on the eyes. Unidiff work better for files that have already be patched, because of the 6 lines of context. It is the de facto standard for Linux patches. BTW: for SuSE Linux 6.2, you have to change LIBREADLINE = -lreadline into LIBREADLINE = -lreadline $(LIBCURSES) in 'configs/Makeconf.linux' to make it compile. Kurt -- ------------------------------------------------------------ | yes, it runs | Designed for | Microsoft | intel | | with Netware | Windows 95 | Windows compliant | inside | ------------------------------------------------------------ If you still have problems reading this signature, get Linux and a REAL cpu!Received on 1999-11-04 03:09:43