(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
Steve, What's in your /usr/coda/etc/vstab? Are you using a LOG file or a raw log partition, same for data on the server? What is the size of that data file? Things are slow (and a solution is in the making) but what you tell us is terrible. - Peter - On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Steven N. Hirsch wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Feb 1998, Jim Doyle wrote: > > > > > Tonight, as a respite from my DCE hacking, I decided to give a go at > > porting Coda to Linux/Alpha. I am running Redhat 5.0 (2.0.32 kernel) on > > several fairly beefy Alpha servers. > > > > There are 64-bit safety hazards throughout Coda. I dont believe any of > > them will be difficult to fix - its just really busy work. For those > > of you that dont understand this: A virtual memory address (i.e. a > > void * or an anything *) is a 64 bit integer. This corresponds to > > the "unsigned long int" datatype. On non-AXP machines (Intel, SPARC, PPC), > > a virtual memory address is 32-bits, and can fit into an "int" type. > > > > Now would be a good time (or, at the next Coda src freeze point) to > > go make Coda 64-bit safe. As I said its just alot of busy work. > > > > I will gladly volunteer as a tester for anything you can come up with. > I'd really like to participate in the coding, but the sheer volume of > source is absolutely overwhelming, and I'm not aware of any "roadmap" > documentation :-(. > > Under Intel Linux, I've yet to get through my basic networking test: > > - Copy linux source tree to coda volume > - Do 'make mrproper' > - Do 'make xconfig' > (etc.) > > Copying the source to the server takes almost an hour (and, yes, I do have > the metadata and log on their own partitions). This is incredibly slow.. > > Make mrproper fails on the first pass because it still thinks that > directories it has just cleaned of files are busy. > > If I clean by hand, and attempt xconfig it fails with random corrupted > files. > > Smaller applications will build (most of the time), but something's broken > somewhere. Any ideas where to look? > > Steve > >Received on 1998-02-08 21:10:13