(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Steven N. Hirsch wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Peter J. Braam wrote: > > > Jan is completely right, and the messages you get will disappear if you > > run an auth2 server and log in to Coda. We are hoping to make Coda more > > chown friendly, but it is not high on the to do list. > > auth2 server? I'll read the docs and find out how to do this. I guess I > assumed that if I wasn't authorized, I wouldn't be able to read/write Coda > at all! No, a volume is always created with all rights for anyone in the ACL. The system administrator corrects this when mounting. So a standard volume for braam, mounted on /coda/usr/braam would get cfs setacl /coda/usr/braam braam all System:AnyUser rl New directories inherit the acl from the parent. There are a number of problems with unauthenticated operation of Coda (which we will look at, but they are not on our urgent list) having to do with the fact that re-integration requires tokens. If your bandwidth fell briefly, you could have a problem, unless you have tokens. > > > > As for the copying taking an hour: > > > I get a bandwidth of at least 250kb/s when running both the client and > > > server on a 486/66 with 16MB RAM and 30MB swap. Which results in > > > _copying_ a clean linux-2.1.85 kernel tree in around 3 minutes. > > > > > > > What do you mean with _copying_? I think what we are interested in here > > is tar zxvf linux-2.1.84.tar.gz. This is slow, but should not take an > > hour. > > Actually, I'm doing cp -a /usr/src/linux /coda/src. > > Steve > >Received on 1998-02-10 09:59:05