"Peter J. Braam" wrote:
> It's pretty clear that it is a bug in the kernel code and to be more
> precise the cache entry in the dcache doesn't get invalidated apparently. 
> 
> Did you mount volumes or anything like it?  This could well be at the root
> of the confusion.
> 
> Peter

I have seen exactly these problems when reintegration records were lost,
and the file `existed' in the client's metadata, but not on the server.

But it might also have been fixed/avoided by correcting the size of the
CFS_FLUSH downcall, which was ignored as the packet size was too small.

Jan