(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, David Steere wrote: > Sorry to keep beating the same dead horse... > > So I convinced myself to never touch the auth2 databases again. So adding > users is a snap: au nu. OK. > > Now comes the question of groups. > - How do I add a new group? Add it to groups.coda, with the names of members > - How do I add a member to a group? Same: add it to groups.coda Now run pwd2pdb with some arguments (man will tell you) and you'll get a new .pdb file. Make an index file with pcfgen. Then you are ready to go. > - Is there more than syntax to the naming convention of System:blah? Hm, I don't think so, but group numbers are negative, that's a must. > - Why are the group IDs negative? To say they are groups. > - How much of this is going to change when we get kerberos? We _have_ kerberos. Not much will change. Much will change when we have protection database server. > - Would it be easier if we added commands to cfs to add new members and > groups, rather than That's a long shot. It's better to keep this separate. Cfs is a pioctl tool only, I don't want to add another feature to it. A user database server is being worked but I want to LDAPize this stuff. AFS has pts this is similar to what we need. > having a separate tool? I'd be willing to write it but I can't > guarantee it'd happen fast. (If I did it, > I'd have cfs connect to the auth2 server directly ala au, not going > through venus as it does for the other commands). There is a student working on this and he is making good progress, so just hold off a little. - Peter - > > david. > > >Received on 1998-09-17 14:29:04