Right; standard UFS-type filsystems would start to suck on that much data.
For Linux, there's "ext3fs" and logging extensions to ext2fs in the works.
There's also several completely new filesystems in the works, as well as
full NTFS support. It'd be cool if someone ported BFS (BeOS file system) to
Linux. It's a 64-bit journaling file system. Woohoo!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thoth_at_purplefrog.com [mailto:thoth_at_purplefrog.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 5:01 PM
> To: codalist_at_TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu
> Subject: Re: multiple CODA servers spread over a WAN 
> 
> 
> Dan Hollis <goemon_at_sasami.anime.net> ,in message 
> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905051337220.3
> 	0591-100000_at_sasami.anime.net>, wrote: 
> 
> > The thought of fsck time on 36tb scares me.
> 
>   Which is why they use journaling filesystems such as Veritas for big
> filesystems.  I have also heard legends of a journaling 
> filesystem derived
> from ext2 that is in the works.
> 
> -- 
> Bob Forsman                                   thoth_at_gainesville.fl.us
>            http://www.gainesville.fl.us/~thoth/
>