(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Jan Harkes wrote: > I would say that re-exporting Coda through NFS or Samba definitely does > not solve you High Availability problem. First of all the node that > re-exports the Coda-FS will be your single point of failure. And second, > you increase the chances on getting conflicts that will affect everybody > and not just the user causing the conflict. Normally, only the less > frequently occuring server-server conflicts will be visible for all > clients, and most of these are already automatically resolved by the > Coda servers. > > Providing only read-only access through the samba/nfs exports can be > done reliably, but that is probably not what you want. > I need read and write access. So, Coda isn't a good solution to achieve a high availability ISP (normally an ISP client hasn't Coda source). Do you Know a solution to achieve a high availability ISP with Coda? Should if forget coda in my project ? Thanks Iniaki ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DEBIAN/GNU /V\ siae0080_at_gc.ehu.es siasevii_at_clientes.euskaltel.es // \\ Linux registered user #93164 SLINK 2.1 /( )\ Student in Computer Engineering ^^-^^ University of San Sebastian (Spain) www.debian.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Received on 1999-06-24 14:19:05