(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
>>>>> "Minh" == Ha Duong Minh <minh.ha.duong_at_cmu.edu> writes: Minh> While I understand there are many advantages to have files Minh> under /coda, I have not found in the doc how to make this Minh> consistent with the File Hierarchy Standard. FHS is mandated for Linux distributions. This makes interoperability of utilities much simpler. But local admins do not have to conform if they have reason not to. /home -> /coda/home seems like a good reason for varying from FHS to me. Anyway, I don't really see the difference between this and mounting a separate Unix file system on /home. Ha> It seems that one has to use lots of links, for example to map Ha> /usr/share and /home to some point under the /coda. I don't see why this is a problem. It's not that many links; /home and /usr/share are the main ones I can think of offhand. You might also want to do this for some of the caches (eg, TeX's fonts) under /var, but you wouldn't want to do it for /var itself. I don't see any way to avoid links with current Coda technology, since there can only be one /coda per machine. So you couldn't mount coda on both /home and /usr/share (and AFAIK mounting somewhere other than /coda is not all that well tested). -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."Received on 2001-02-14 22:33:58