(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
I orinally tried running Coda on Redhat 7.0 and ran into several problems. So, I switched to Redhat 6.2 and have had much fewer problems. From my experiences, Redhat 6.2 will work a lot better. --------------------------------------------------------------- Ryan M. Lefever [lefever_at_uiuc.edu] [217.244.8887] [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever] Graduate Research Assistant Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing -- PERFORM Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign --------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 21 May 2001, GiantWEB wrote: > Do U suggest using redhat 6.2 for now? > > I need a stable version to test.. > > Thanks, > -Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Harkes [mailto:jaharkes_at_cs.cmu.edu] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:44 PM > To: Ajay S. Kang > Cc: > Subject: Re: 5.3.14 compile problem > > > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:25:18PM -0400, Ajay?S. Kang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I downloaded coda 5.3.14, lwp 1.7, rpc2 1.11 and rvm 1.4 and was able > > to configure and make lwp,rpc2 and rvm sucessfully. The configure > > script for coda also ran without errors. However when I ran make I > > got the following: > > RedHat 7.1, I know. > > I've already got a bunch of these fixed up, tried compiling using a > gcc-3.0 beta release. However I'm stuck at some very broken looking > varargs parsing code in venus/vol_cml.cc. > > > another error. Since I didn't see any queries on the mailing list > > about this I suspect the error is not something as simple as a few > > missing #includes... Am I missing something in the make process? > > No, you are just using a bleeding edge version of the gcc which is a lot > stricter about using functions without prototypes etc. Hopefully the > next Coda release will pass through the compiler correctly. You can also > grab a copy from our CVS tree and see how far that one gets you. > > Jan > >Received on 2001-05-21 21:01:44