(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
Jeremy Malcolm wrote: >Well, it's been an interesting (almost) year trying to get coda to work in what >is meant to be a simple configuration (two servers with replicated volumes, and >one or more laptop users with disconnected operation). Enough is enough though, >and I've decided that for at least my purposes the following technologies are >far more stable, simple and reliable yet supply at least the functionality that >coda does: > Sorry to say that I've come to this too. But I'm goning for one last shot. (BTW: Have you tried OpenAFS - it's quite similar to CODA). But I *really* want that nice replication stuff for offline use of a laptop. But something tells me this is wrong if coda has lived for over 10 years - and is not used more than it is and lacks all that documentation (clear docu that is). Otherwise it seems a little limited (volumesizes and such which we have discussed). >* RAID-1 over Linux network block device for server replication > What version will you go for? The standard one seems flaky and old. Seen a "enhanced NBD" version which looks more promising. I think Intermezzo will be th successor, yes. But it's still too immature.Received on 2001-12-12 10:55:44