(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 07:38, ext Jan Harkes wrote: > That bug should only exist in kernels before 2.4.10. If the default > kernel version is lower, there is probably a more recent kernel > available with the RedHat security updates, some security fixes were > in more recent 2.4 kernels. You mean it's now okay ot use ext3 as /vicepa? > > Would you like to tell me how to solve this problem ? or Any correct way to > > install ` CODA' on RedHat 8.0 ? > > Either install the compat-libc rpms and try to work from the binary > release, or pull the latest stuff from CVS... Or wait a week (or 2?) > until we got everything building right on the various platforms and > release a new set of binaries. > I installed ncurses4 and readline2, as suggested by Niraj, but I get the same error as Armani -- I try to start codasrv on a Red Hat 8.0 system, and it segfaults. [root_at_sagarmatha linux]# codasrv Segmentation fault [root_at_sagarmatha linux]# gdb codasrv GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.2.1-4) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/sbin/codasrv Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x4206fd2b in _IO_doallocbuf_internal () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (gdb) where #0 0x4206fd2b in _IO_doallocbuf_internal () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #1 0x4207140a in _IO_old_file_seekoff () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #2 0x400bdaa5 in filebuf::seekoff () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 #3 0x42070e22 in _IO_old_file_fopen () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #4 0x420695dc in freopen () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #5 0x0804c14e in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffffa44) at /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/coda-5.3.19/coda-src/vice/srv.cc:375 Don't worry, Jan, I blame Red Hat, not you :-). Known bug, or something new? Next step is to download the code and compile, which I haven't done yet... --RodReceived on 2002-12-13 18:01:21