(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 14:08, ext Jan Harkes wrote: > So the laptop is disconnnected, and probably has a conflict that is > blocking reintegration. > > > [root_at_localhost rdv]# 16:10:37 Checkpointing developers:rdv > > 16:10:37 to /usr/coda/spool/500/developers_rdv@_coda_rdv.tar > > 16:10:37 and /usr/coda/spool/500/developers_rdv@_coda_rdv.cml > > 16:10:37 Reintegrate: developers:rdv, 100/114 records, result = Unknown > > error 198 > > Not sure what 198 is, but reintegration failed. The first entry in > /usr/coda/spool/500/developers_rdv@_coda_rdv.cml should be the operation > that is causing the problem. > [rdv_at_localhost rdv]$ more !$ more /usr/coda/spool/500/developers_rdv\@_coda_rdv.cml Create /coda/rdv/nokia/la4a58~1.txt Store /coda/rdv/nokia/la4a58~1.txt (length = 97994) Create /coda/rdv/nokia/la4a5b~1.txt Store /coda/rdv/nokia/la4a5b~1.txt (length = 25423) Create /coda/rdv/nokia/la4e38~1.txt Store /coda/rdv/nokia/la4e38~1.txt (length = 29806) ... (there are a couple of dozen files with these goofy names -- don't ask.) Later in the list there is a file with a space in its name -- is this a problem? There's also an RCS directory with "," in the file names. > Nice, but what is the status of the volume mounted at /coda/rdv? rdv_at_localhost rdv]$ cfs lv /coda/rdv Status of volume 0x7f000001 (2130706433) named "developers:rdv" Volume type is Replicated Connection State is Disconnected Write-back is disabled There are 117 CML entries pending for reintegration > > > This, despite the fact that I believe there should be no conflicts, and > > repair says: > > No conflicts in the codaroot volume, but developers:rdv seems to be the > problematic one. You can try to search for it with, > > find /coda/rdv -lname '@*' > Returns nothing. The set of files is still small enough that I can see that there are no conflicts. Everything in the pending .cml is above everything that already exists, alphabetically, except for the creation of a subdir, so it's easy to verify visually. (In fact, seems likely that, for some reason, this failed partway through the whole set, which gave me this ordering; they should have all been created at the same time.) You're right, I was looking at the wrong volume info. I'm going to go fiddle with it now (involves switching networks away from where I read my email). --RodReceived on 2003-01-09 17:37:38