Coda File System

Re: SCM and redundancy

From: Ivan Popov <pin_at_math.chalmers.se>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:01:02 +0100 (MET)
On 27 Feb 2003, Steffen Neumann wrote:

> Your sysadmin will have different things in mind
> if his SCM (very often a central machine) is down,
> and delay other things anyway ;-)

:-)

I thought about something like planned maintainance,
otherwise of course, SCM usually hosts some volumes too
so you do not want it to be down for long :-)

It may be not a too bad idea, though,
to have a volume-less SCM, if you want to split the functions.

Then it is still central, but not at all critical to be up.

Cheers,
--
Ivan
Received on 2003-02-27 09:02:41