-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jan Harkes wrote:

>>Now _that_ looks like the wrong version!  BTW wouldn't it make sense to 
>>supply the correct module version in the debian packages in the first place?

Your debian packages, not the Debian ones IYSWIM [g].  I meant the 
protocol version or whatever - maybe I'm wrong but I got the impression 
that the module in the announcement was for coda 5.x.y.  Then again I've 
seen several versions of most things so perhaps I was mistaken.  If so 
please pardon me!

> For which kernel? I just did apt-cache search kernel-image | wc -l and
> got 70 different packages. Basically most possible combinations of
>     2.4.16, 2.4.18, 2.4.20, 2.4.21, 2.6.0-test2

As I said above I wouldn't expect you to track that!

> Interestingly my search didn't even return your kernel (2.4.21-xfs) as
> one of the options.

It's what you get with Knoppix, but I've gone to a Debian kernel now. 
And it's working.

> Oh, and back to the original question. Venus-setup doesn't do anything
> that debconf/dpkg-reconfigure doesn't already do on a Debian system.

OK, sure, it's just that the 4-year old docs refer to venus-setup.  A 
newcomer like me has to navigate lots of stuff like that.  Anyway, I/ve 
got a working client now and am near to sorting out the server, so if 
you can bear it please humour me for a little longer - and I'll be able 
to help field other newbie stuff for you!

- -- 
Ian Smith

Saltstone Media Limited
The Old Workhouse, Union Road,
Kingsbridge, Devon TQ7 1EQ

tel: +44 (0) 1548 854038
fax: +44 (0) 1548 854039

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/WEOqqPkrLbscPPERAqW6AKCDQq+024OsWOM2eL67RwLS2XTOsQCfTlPe
JgTKWLkUmG79s0/84A4wylI=
=8Xol
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----