(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:08:47PM +0200, Florian Schaefer wrote: > On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:05:04 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull said: > > Is this the release version of 6.02, or is it the CVS head (which > > still advertises itself as 6.02)? There have been changes since the > > release which have reduced the 198 - unknown errors to zero for me for > > over a month now (and I was getting them daily until then). > > I'm using the release version 6.0.2. > > Does this mean, that my issue is a known bug and that I can reinitialise > my venus? Or is there another way to resolve the problem? I remember having had a lot of problems with 6.0.2 and an alpha server and I did fix several problems. The most important one ended up being an incorrect byte-swap in RPC2 which made it completely fail on the roundtrip time calculation, causing a high number of disconnections that didn't happen on a switched 100base-T, but occured quite frequently on the half-duplex 10base-T network to the test server. But I guess there were a couple of reintegration and resolution fixes as well, although most of them should only be an issue when you have multiple servers. JanReceived on 2003-10-05 23:42:17