(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
I have just started using coda and have a few questions I would like to ask the assembled wisdom of this mailing list. - Would coda have trouble with large filesystems, in the range 600Gb - 1.5Tb? (E.g., a raid) - If I were to set up a coda server, and I was just as willing to run Free/Net/OpenBsd or linux, is there a best candidate? - I note that there is what seems like a nice coda-follow-on project, Intermezzo, which has the usual apparent plusses of a follow-on project: clean-slate redesign, can take advantage of existing pieces like ext3, etc. But intermezzo seems a zombie -- there's been nothing posted on the http://inter-mezzo.org/news.html page for well over a year. Further, chasing pointers on the intermezzo page leads to Clusterfs.com and Lustre. + Is intermezzo dead, long live lustre? Or what? + What's the current energy level of coda development these days? The mailing lists seem quite lively, at least. + Were one to choose between lustre, coda & intermezzo, can anyone give me a rough picture of the tradeoffs? My criteria are: + private use, can't pay $$$ + disconnected use over WAN + replicated servers good + clients for Win, BSD, linux & Mac good Perhaps this coda/intermezzo/lustre question is a politically charged question of the sort that makes regular members of this mailing list roll their eyes in a here-we-go-again sort of way, and if so, please excuse my ignorance. Thanks! -OlinReceived on 2004-01-14 12:45:36