(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
> >> If the user is mostly creating files locally which then get > >> uploaded to the server, and any updates are made by that user. > > Juan> What did you mean here? That it should work well with users > Juan> only uploading documents? > > If users are modifying the same documents at the same time, you are > likely to get conflicts. Coda does not lock documents while you are > modifying them. Ok, I think I'd try to find a solution using ACL to avoid these problems, but I think these problems wont be very common. > >> On the other hand, if different users are editing the same > >> files, then you might be better off with a different method > >> that only sends changes. > > Juan> Which method would work for this? This is not the case, but > Juan> I've seen out there some things about sinchronizing file > Juan> versions (consuming much less bandwidth). Is there a > Juan> solution for this with low bandwidth?. > > It's not the bandwidth, it's the conflicts. If you have multiple > users editing the same file, you either want something that will allow > you to lock the file, or something that helps you resolve conflicts. > > But htat sounds different from your case. Yes, I think this wont be a problem. But (thinking about using less bandwidth) as the clients will be located in LANs of 4 or 5 computers (all them clients), can't the clients use local LAN cached copies of the files? Is it necessary for doing something like this to have a server in the local LAN? Would this be a good improvement in bandwidth? I'm evaluating if installing a not very powerful PC as a local server would be much better. > >From what you say, I think you will be quite happy with Coda. You > should run into very few conflicts, your users will notice less lags > than with a web server most of the time, and uploads (which are > called "reintegration" in Coda) will be almost always in the > background and automatic. Yes, I hope so. The last thing I have doubts on is how the clients will share the bandwidth and how to synchronize with the server. How do I avoid the clients going to "write-disconnected" mode having bandwidth as low as 64KB (and also shared between them)? Thanks, Juan Carlos > > -- > Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp > University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN > Ask not how you can "do" free software business; > ask what your business can "do for" free software. > >Received on 2004-05-30 16:33:16