(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:29:30AM -0300, Gabriel B. wrote: > So, anyone here have experience with simpler networked file servers to > point me in some other direction? my brief experience with coda really > showed that nfs should be avoided at all costs indeed. NFS is really the simplest to set up. You could also look at OpenAFS, which doesn't have RVM and is probably management wise a bit more mature compared to Coda. Many of the features you learned from Coda, like the volume management, are surprisingly similar since both evolved from AFS2 and as a result Coda and OpenAFS are sort of siblings. Other people tried a combination of a nbd (network block device) combined with raid mirroring/striping. In your case you could even experiment with how usable a davfs/squid cache combination would be :) There are also a bunch of userspace filesystems built around FUSE (http://fuse.sourceforge.net/), haven't really looked at any of them, but there might be something interesting. Then there are several userspace solutions that don't require a networked or distributed filesystem but most of the time these work quite well. I often recommend programs like rsync, cvs/subversion, and unison (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/). It all depends on the type of syncronization that you need. JanReceived on 2005-03-27 20:23:42