(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Serr <serrs_at_theserrs.net> writes: Scott> Currently we have offices in several countries that have Scott> large NFS servers - I think most are NetApps (Network Scott> Appliance) NAS. These are currently being syncronized by Scott> using rsync cron jobs at night. The problem is this Scott> doesn't scale well and the network is having trouble Scott> keeping up. Have you considered the BitTorrent protocol instead of rsyncing to a central server? Of course you'd still have to find a way to identify new and changed files (BitTorrent as such assumes that's already been done), and if the changes are small relative to the files you might want to use rsync for transport anyway. Those might be bigger problems than daisy-chaining by hand if it's a fairly small number of servers. Besides the comments Ivan made, you should also be aware that Coda doesn't do a lot to optimize file transport IIRC: if one bit changes, you have to transport the whole file before you can access any of it again. -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.Received on 2005-09-13 03:00:54