(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:29:34PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > unix mode bits and the corresponding "owner" and "group" are > > meaningless on Coda. > > Thats very bad, since evrything on my system depends on it. > I'm using coda just as an caching nfs replacement. I don't That's a pity. Coda is fundamentally different from nfs and even if we hope that it can be called "a better file system", it is in no way "a better nfs-like file system", not even a "posix file system" at all. The reason is that Posix does not provide any foundation for globality. > want te whole acl stuff. In my situation this is just useless > overhead. Possibly Coda is not a right solution for you. Its administration assumes very different design and approaches than nfs does. A migration of a strongly nfs-bound installation to Coda may even necessitate a major redesign. Regards, RuneReceived on 2007-02-27 02:50:39