(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
* shivers_at_ccs.neu.edu <shivers_at_ccs.neu.edu> wrote: Hi, > Note that if coda were rock solid and scaled like this, > then you would never have to waste disk space setting up > RAID arrays on every disk system in your life -- you'd > only need to RAID your coda *server*, while all your > client boxes could run un-RAIDed. AFAIK, if you run multiple mirrored servers, you probably can even live w/o RAID. If one system fails, another one jumps in. But I didn't test this yet. Probably depends on Coda's behaviour on broken storage. So the big question is: what happens if the an underlying FS fails ? Does Coda properly detect this and drive to some clean state (ie. take an damaged volume offline and kick clients to the next server ?) cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------Received on 2007-05-18 18:04:15