(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
Hello Brett, thanks for taking the time to answer! On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:07:00PM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 01:16:25PM +0200, u+codalist-p4pg_at_chalmers.se wrote: > > > > We lack the hardware for doing regular development on x86_64 > > nor are we inclined to duplicate the efforts for maintaining another > > development environment. > > Keeping userland 32-bit does indeed spare a lot of resources. > Why not just use something like qemu to do the 32bit work? Performance > should be quite acceptable on a 64bit machine. It is unfortunately the other way around, we have 32-bit of both worlds, hardware and software, but we want/have to support 64-bits systems as well. Not a problem to run the usual userspace, nor for the kernel module for Coda (available in the stock binary kernels) - but a challenge for the Coda client userspace. Thanks anyway! RuneReceived on 2007-07-10 08:17:25