(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Sean E. Millichamp wrote: > Disclaimer: IANAL > > While there is often much BSD-ish code in various Linux distributions I > thought that the GPL prohibited inclusion of, or linking to, any code that > is non-GPL. Pretty much. You can license your version of XFree86 code under the GPL if you like. So it's OK to link it with GPLed code. > Since the Linux kernel is GPL would that not prohibit the > linking/inclusion of BSD code into the kernel tree? Yes, because the BSD license includes some restrictions that make it impossible to distribute it under the GPL. > I think that the only > way that it could happen legally is by a loadable module, am I way off on > this? RMS believes that loadable modules violate the GPL; Linus disagrees. Eventually someone will sue someone, and it'll be settled in court. -- <kragen@pobox.com> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/> [around 1998-12-23], it is amazing to watch fear and loathing and greed at play with the more speculative Internet stocks. To call this a tulip craze would be a vast understatement. -- Adam Rifkin, <adam_at_cs.caltech.edu>Received on 1999-01-07 17:05:48