>Thanks; We're looking at starting with a little over 4TB of storage, and
>AFS/DFS/EFS may be our only option at this point. I appreciate your
>response. I look forward to testing the new big-filesystem version of CODA.

What's the difference between AFS and Coda?

>Will you need to use a better (logged/transactional/journaling) filesystem?
>Or would UFS-type filesystems be adequate for the job? I winder if Be, Inc
>would allow BeFS, their 64-bit journaling file system, to be ported to
>Linux...

:-)
-- 
I'm busily ignoring some thousand of implications I have determined to be irrelevant.