(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Nicolas Huillard wrote: > Third, I'll only use Coda for mostly-read file systems (no POP/SMTP). Here, > I consider FTP as a mostly read service, because there will be very low > writing traffic, without any contention (onefile is uploaded to one server, > I don't care which one, and the same file will never be uploaded once more > on another server - I cross finger, but the application is done like that), > and I hope Coda will handle it gently. That sound very similar to the setup of the Coda webserver, which is serving everything out of Coda. The `problem' I have noticed is that the cache is gaining approximately 2MB every night. This seems to be related to the the glimpseindex runs. I have not yet really looked into it, but it might be related to unlinking (temporary) files that are still open. > Postgres : I think one can't store the Postgres DB on a Coda FS. This won't > help in any way, because only one instance of Postgres can use a DB > directory (most data will be stored in memory, shared between Postgres > processes serving the same DB instance). I plan to use a Correct, in a way any filesystem is a database, and why would Coda be able to solve the replication issues for other database systems that have not been able to solve the replication issues themselves. JanReceived on 2000-06-16 13:00:47