(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Jan Harkes wrote: > > exported by Coda. No offence meant. Coda offers very special properties > > that are hardly synchronizable with other "access paths", i.e if you'd > > insist on accessing your files via the local filesystem. > > Not only that, but the server wouldn't necessarily notice when a user > modifies a file on the 'exported' filesystem. As a result it would not > break callbacks to inform client that a file was updated. And because It *could* be possible to rewrite the server (and probably have to implement a local file system suitable for putting the files on it), so that the server *would* be able to notice the changes. That's why I wrote "hardly" instead of "absolutely not". While the meaning is very much the same :-) Such a project would be far away from being a reasonable one, wouldn't it? Cheers, -- IvanReceived on 2002-12-09 10:47:17