(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Phalan <mphalan_at_o2.ie> writes: Mark> I guess I was just thinking it would be a nice optimization Mark> for those cases where clients are strongly connected and Mark> trying to access small parts of huge files (bigger than Mark> cache). Its ability to operate in a disconnected state is Mark> undoubtedly a great feature but not its only one (scale, Mark> performance, etc). Sure. We've already come a long way in that direction: the virtual file system abstraction allows users to (mostly) not care about the strong and weaks points of individual file system implementations. At the current state of the art, though, the fact that there are multiple implementations, with different characteristics, can't be hidden from the system admin at all. And sometimes it even impinges on users, as in the multimedia storage application you describe. I wonder if you wouldn't be better off with a central web server and a caching proxy like squid (assuming that the multimedia players can handle media streamed over HTTP). -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.Received on 2004-01-28 01:07:26