(Illustration by Gaich Muramatsu)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 07:32:20PM +0100, Maurice van der Pot wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:47:06AM -0600, Nicholas Haggin wrote: > > I decided to take Maurice's other suggestion as well and run a > > vanilla > > kernel, and the system has not experienced so much as a hiccup. I > > probably did compromise control, however, since I also disabled ACPI in > > the new kernel. When time permits I'll build one with ACPI enabled and > > compare. > > But it appears the problem has been solved, for now. > > If it doesn't crash with vanilla + ACPI either, please enter a bug in > our (Gentoo's) bugzilla. And if you feel like tracking down the bug > yourself, try applying only subsets of the gentoo patches. If you need > help deciding which ones, add me to the cc of the bug you submit. My guess would be '4800_inotify-0.17.patch'. It seems like the only one that adds some significant changes to the VFS. JanReceived on 2005-02-11 14:40:35